Study of Teacher Effectiveness: Two Sets Of Eyes Better Than One
There’s plenty to consider in the final report of the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation’s* three-year Measures of Effective
Teaching (MET) study, which was
released Tuesday.
Here’s one of the interesting highlights: Researchers found it
was better to have two different evaluators observe a classroom,
rather than have one evaluator make multiple visits to watch the
same teacher. Additionally, the study concludes that using
multiple measures — test-score growth data, feedback from
students, and the observations of teachers at work — also helped
craft a fairer portrayal of a teacher’s effectiveness.
The MET project has been a source of contention and controversy
from its inception. As
Education Week’s Stephen Sawchuk notes:
Taken as a whole, the final MET findings provide much food for thought about how teacher evaluations might best be structured. But they are not likely to end a contentious, noisy debate about evaluation systems, and they are almost certain to be intensely debated, in part because of Gates’ separate support for advocacy organizations that have already staked out positions on teacher evaluations.
For the full background on MET, check out my EWA colleague
Mikhail Zinshteyn’s write-up over at
EdMedia Commons.
*The Gates Foundation is among a range of
funders providing ongoing support to EWA.
Have a question, comment or concern for the Educated Reporter?
Email EWA public editor Emily Richmond at erichmond@ewa.org.
Follow her on Twitter: @EWAEmily.
Comments
Post new comment