Blog: Higher Ed Beat

College Admissions: The V.I.P. Treatment
Do students from wealthy or politically connected families get preference in the admissions process?

The wealthy and politically connected have many advantages in life. But do they really have an edge getting into the best colleges?

Some impressive investigative work by two journalists in Texas and Virginia reveals that family money and influence appear to have helped students get into at least two top public universities.

Those journalists — Jon Cassidy of The Texas Monitor and T. Rees Shapiro of The Washington Post — discussed their work and the challenges they overcame to report on secret admissions systems at the University of Virginia and the University of Texas’ top-ranked law school. They also offered tips on investigating other schools during a panel discussion they led at this year’s annual conference of the Education Writers Association in Washington D.C.

Cassidy said he wrote dozens of stories to demonstrate how the admissions process at Texas’ flagship school had become corrupt. He shared examples of students who were admitted despite low scores on the Law School Admission Test and who later failed the state bar exam multiple times. His reporting spotlighted how some lawmakers abused their positions to influence admissions decisions.

“They had a back door into University of Texas,” Cassidy told a room of mostly education reporters who had gathered at Georgetown University for the EWA conference. “They could get their kids in. They could get themselves in.”

Shapiro said a source tipped him off to a similar scenario at the University of Virginia, one of the country’s richest and most selective public universities. The source shared documents indicating the school’s fundraising arm had been keeping a “watch list” of applicants — namely the children of donors and well-to-do alumni.

The documents also showed that the advancement office had helped students whose applications were at risk of being rejected. The office “kept meticulous notes on the status of certain VIP applicants and steps taken on their behalf,” according to an article Shapiro wrote for The Washington Post earlier this year.

Shapiro confronted the university, but officials denied flagging these students for special treatment.

“When I went to U-Va. and showed them their own documents, they adamantly denied it,” he said. “Those weren’t admissions documents, so they could deny it.”

Shapiro and Cassidy said working with university officials and trying to gain access to public records are among the major challenges they have faced in doing investigative work. They offered a number of great tips to help other reporters take on similar projects. Here are some of the tips they offered during their hour-long talk:

  • Having a good working relationship with a university’s communications team may not get you far when you need to write about something that potentially will put the school in a bad light. You’ll likely have to fight for information and access to college leadership.
  • University officials may “play word games” to make it more difficult for reporters to get information through public-records requests. They may charge high fees for records in hopes a reporter will back off a story. “They will use the money and your time against you,” Cassidy said. He said he was fortunate to have someone give him guidance on what exactly to ask for when he was investigating admissions decisions at the University of Texas’ law school.
  • If you are asked to pay a high fee for copies of public records, insist the fee be reduced or eliminated.
  • The names of people who have passed or failed bar exams are public record.
  • FERPA (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) protects student records. But it does not apply to the records of students who applied to a university but got rejected. Cassidy said he was able to get LSAT scores by asking law schools for the records of certain students who had applied but whose applications had been rejected by those schools.
  • Ask for copies of all correspondence between the university’s president and legislators and between the president and big donors. Find out who the president’s “right- hand man” is and ask for correspondence between that person and others.
  • Ask to see a university’s “watch list” or “VIP list” or “applicant tracking list.”
  • Ask for information about who sits in the university president’s luxury box at athletic games.
  • Ask for information about who took campus tours organized by the president’s office.
  • Review IRS Form 990s, which offer a variety of financial details about non-profit organizations, including universities. Cassidy called 990s “a gold mine.”
  • Check out any foundations that are affiliated with a particular university. Foundations sometimes provide compensation for a university’s president and other administrators. Donors who want their children to attend a certain school will sometimes give money to one of its foundations.

Denise-Marie Ordway is managing editor of Journalist’s Resource, a project of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy. You can reach her at denise-marie_ordway@hks.harvard.edu or 617-496-9068.